|
Cure and prevent diabetes mellitus with diet, not drugs
Introduction
There are many conditions in Western industrialised societies today that were unheard of, or at least very rare, just a century ago. The same conditions are still unheard of in primitive peoples who do not have the 'benefits' of our knowledge. There is a very good reason for this: They eat what Nature intended; we don't.
The diseases caused by our incorrect and unnatural diets are those featured on these pages.
Advertisement
and
both say:
People with diabetes have a greater risk of developing heart disease and/or
hardening of the arteries.Try and cut down on the fat you eat, particularly
saturated (animal) fats. . .Use less butter, margarine, cheese and fatty meats.
Choose low fat dairy foods like skimmed milk and low fat yogurt. Grill, steam
or oven bake instead of frying or cooking with oil or other fats.
Choose a diet with plenty of grain products, vegetables, and fruits. These
foods should provide the mainstay of what you eat. Eat regular meals based on
starchy foods such as bread, pasta, chapatis, potatoes, rice and cereals.
Whenever possible, choose high fibre varieties of these foods, like wholemeal
bread and wholemeal cereals.
In other words, they say that diabetics should eat a carbohydrate-based,
low-fat diet.
BUT THE EVIDENCE ACTUALLY SAYS:
|
Coulston AM, et al.
American Journal of Medicine
1987; 82: 213-220.
|
'it seems prudent to avoid the use of low-fat, high-carbohydrate diets
containing moderate amounts of sucrose in patients with non-insulin-dependent
diabetes mellitus.'
|
|
Garg A, et. al.
New England Journal of Medicine
1988; 319: 829-34.
|
'As compared with the high-carbohydrate diet, the high-monounsaturated-fat
diet resulted in lower mean plasma glucose levels and reduced insulin
requirements, lower levels of plasma triglycerides and very low-density
lipoprotein [LDL — the 'bad'] cholesterol , and higher levels of
high-density lipoprotein [HDL — the 'good'] cholesterol. Levels of total
cholesterol did not differ significantly in patients on the two diets.'
|
|
Hays J.Paper presented to the 81st Annual Meeting of the Endocrine Society,
15June1999.
|
"A very high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet has been shown to have astounding
effects in helping type 2 diabetics lose weight and improve their blood lipid
profiles."
|
Dr. James Hays, an endocrinologist and director of the Limestone Medical Center
in Wilmington, DE, presented the results of three studies of men and women with
type 2 diabetes involving very high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet at the annual
meeting of the Endocrine Society. His study showed an impressive benefit in
body mass index (BMI), triglycerides, HDL, LDL and HbA1c.
Patients were able to eat all the meat and cheese they
wanted, but as for carbohydrates, they are restricted to eating unprocessed
foods, mainly fresh fruit and vegetables. Whereas in a normal diet 60 percent
of calories would come from carbohydrates and 30 percent from fat, patients in
this diet were encouraged to get 50 percent of their caloric intake from fat,
and just 20 percent from carbohydrates.
A whopping 90 percent of the fat content in their
diets was saturated animal fat, compared with just 10 percent that was
monounsaturated
oil.
Dr Hays told his audience that:
Over the course of one year, the subjects achieved
a mean decline in total cholesterol from 231 to 190 mg/dl
LDL (the 'bad' cholesterol) fell from 133 to 105 mg/dl,
HDL (the 'good' cholesterol) increased from 44 to 47 mg/dl.
Triglycerides declined from 229 to 182 mg/dl.
HbA1c, which at the start of the study averaged 3.34 percent above normal,
declined to just 0.96 percent above normal
Average weight loss was in the order of 40 pounds.
By the end of the one-year study 90 percent of the patients had achieved ADA
(American Diabetes Association) targets for HbA1c, HDL, LDL and triglycerides.
As for the response from cardiologists who see a
high-fat diet as anathema to what they have been instructing their patients for
years now, Dr. Hays said he has three cardiology patients who are now on the
diet. And concluded:
"If you have a diet that results in weight loss, lower cholesterol, and a
better lipid profile, eventually, everybody will be eating that way."
Above you have seen some of the evidence that suggests that DiabetesUK and the
American Diabetes Association have got it completely wrong. This is also my
finding from over twenty years of research. In these pages you will find why
the conventional treatment of Diabetes, is resulting in increased morbidity,
the evidence that DiabetesUK and the ADA have got it completely wrong, and the
evidence to support the introduction of a radical departure: a high-fat,
low-carb diet to control both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Proof that it works!
I was in New Zealand in 1999, two months before my book,
Eat Fat, Get Thin!
was published. While there I visited a friend's cousin. NL was seventy-five
years old, overweight, with high blood pressure and diabetic. During the
conversation, my book was mentioned and I said I would send her a copy
although, she told me, as it advocated a high-fat diet, she thought her
diabetes would prevent her from using it. Here is an extract from a letter I
received five months after I sent the book:
|
'When your book arrived I read it immediately and gave myself permission to
think it might, just might, work for me, despite the diabetes factor which I
had said to you could possibly complicate blood sugar results. You assured me
that it was more possible that these would improve.
'I changed my diet in February and in that and the following month my weight
dropped by eight pounds. It was such a luxury to be eating all the hitherto
"naughty" things that had been such a "no-no" and being rewarded for my sins. I
felt better in all ways and my blood sugars became far more stable, and lower
than they had been for years.
'I had meant to write before . . . but as it was getting close to my annual
full diabetic general check-up, I thought I might have medical evidence to
confirm my feelings of improved well-being. Prior to my G.P.'s appointment I
had been for a variety of blood tests and also an ophthalmologist's examination
— retinal photography and pressure measurements.
'First major surprise — the pressure behind my eyes which had for many
years been border-line glaucoma, had reduced — "excellent" result.
Cholesterol (total), HDLcholesterol and triglycerides had all improved, my
glycosated haemoglobin was down by 1.5 and blood pressure was down from 160/90
in June last year to 130/74 — the lowest I can ever remember having.
Naturally my G.P. was very confused by my "second coming" and her tut-tutting
lacked conviction when I told her of meeting you, receiving your book and
becoming a convert to and practitioner of what you advocate. So count me as one
of your most loyal disciples.'
|
And from a health professional in the private medical sector
|
I was diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes in October 2000, at the age of 37. At this
time, my weight was registering an all-time high of 14 stone, BP was 142/92,
with an HbA1c of 8%+.
I was issued with the standard low-fat high carbohydrate diet sheet and duly
went home and followed the dietary advice to the letter. I also bought a blood
glucose meter and was astonished to find that my blood sugar registered 13+
after each and every so-called "healthy" meal. I felt tired and extremely
unwell, and so, to cut a long story short, I decided to do some of my own
research. Literally 2 days later, I had discovered the low carb approach. . . .
I put this regime
into practice, kept a food diary and carried out 5 blood tests a day for 6
months.
At the end of the 6 months, I returned to my local Diabetic Clinic at Edinburgh
Royal Infirmary for my checkup. Tests revealed that my BP had dropped to
123/74, my HbA1c was 5.5 and I had lost 2 stone. More importantly, I felt
fantastic, had loads of energy, and had lost count of the number of people who
commented on how well I looked. My consultant was amazed, but not particularly
interested in my methods. I was astonished that he didn't want to know more ?
so that he could pass on the information to others. (Naive of me, I know!)
Instead he informed me that Diabetes is a progressive disease, and that I'd
need to start a drugs regime within the next couple of years, perhaps even
insulin. It is my intention to prove him wrong. My next HbA1c, 6 months later,
was under 6, with BP and cholesterol well within normal limits. At this point,
my consultant announced that I would only be required to attend the Clinic on a
yearly basis.
So, in summary, I am very happy with my results, and with the way I feel
physically. Incidentally, my father was diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes 6 months
ago, and he has followed my advice as opposed to his doctor's, which is unlike
him. His HbA1c has also reduced from over 8% to 5.7 in the space of 6 months.
His doctors are astonished, as at diagnosis, a random blood sugar test revealed
a reading of 24.
However, the fact that both my father and myself are in the best of health is
not enough for me. The "I'm all-right Jack" scenario is not acceptable to me,
and my dream is to see ALL diabetics given the correct advice at diagnosis ?
it would then be up to the individual as to whether to comply or not. At
present, unless they are blessed with decent research skills, diabetics will
continue to suffer poor health and are destined for a premature death.
During the past 18 months, I have tried, in my own way, to get the message out.
Recently, I attended a large conference on diabetic care in Edinburgh, and
somehow found the courage to stand up in front of hundreds of so-called
Diabetes experts ? consultants, dieticians, and Practice nurses, and briefly
told my story. I was publically lambasted by an indignant dietician who stood
up and declared loudly that "everyone knows the treatment for Type 2 Diabetes
is a high carbohydrate diet".
A couple of weeks ago, in response to a report in a national newspaper on the
subject of obesity, and the rising tide of Type 2 diabetes, I wrote to the 3
quoted "experts", to comment on their continual obsession with the evils of fat
as opposed to sugar. So far I have received no response!
I am the Training Manager for a large nursing agency based in Edinburgh, and as
such am responsible for buying places on appropriate courses for our nurses. I
have recently made the decision not to send any more of our staff on Diabetes
updates run by Lothian Primary Healthcare Trust, after I obtained a copy of
their training syllabus, which revealed a less than enlightened approach to
diet. I am therefore currently putting together a training pack on diabetes for
one of our nurses to deliver informally within her own hospital. It goes
without saying that I will have no hesitation in including information on the
low-carb approach, together with appropriate references for staff to be able to
do their own research.
F N, 9 June 2002
|
These letters are typical of my experience with overweight diabetics. So we
need to ask:
Why does DiabetesUK still insist on low-fat, carbohydrate diets for diabetics?
Conclusion
We may be approaching the end of the disastrous practice of advocating low-fat,
carbohydrate-based diets for weight
loss in diabetics.
Introduction
Part 1: The scale of the problem
Part 2: What is diabetes -- Are you at risk?
Part 3: Conventional treatment for Type-2 diabetes — and why it fails
Part 4: Why carbs are the wrong foods for diabetics
Part 5: The evidence
Part 6: The correct diet for a Type-2 diabetic, (or treatment without drugs)
Part 7: Treatment for Type-1 diabetes
Suitable foods for diabetics
Last updated 6 February 2008
another website, Diabetes Diet spells out in easy to read terms just what causes diabetes and how best to treat diabetes.
|
"A great book that shatters so many of the nutritional fantasies and fads of the last twenty years. Read it and prolong your life."
Clarissa Dickson Wright
"NH&WL may be the best non-technical book on diet ever written"
Joel Kauffman, PhD, Professor Emeritus, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA
- a completely new kind of video and DVD.
"Must be regarded as essential reading . . . informative and thought-provoking." Dr Vyvyan Howard, MB. ChB. PhD. FRCPath. University of Liverpool.
|