|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skin Cancers and DietPart 3: Skin cancers — Sunscreens (Continued)No one believes that exposure to UV leads to skin cancer more ardently than dermatologists. Dr Roger Ceilley, a leading American dermatologist, proclaimed in 1998, 'We're going to have millions more cases of skin cancer in the next decade' if people forgo sunscreen.[i] In fact, of course, that is exactly what we are seeing — but in people who do use sunscreens. New sunscreens can cause brain damageThere is now a new range of sunscreens, but these seem to widen the range of dangers.[iv] These new products contain tiny nanoparticles which have caused long-term neurological damage in studies on mice. Scientists say the tiny particles may have different chemical compositions, and because nanoparticles are so small they are more easily absorbed into the skin, raising potential risks. It will be years before the safety of nanotechnology can be proven, yet the particles are already being put into use in sunscreens, toothpaste, makeup and other products. The polyunsaturated fat connectionSince the 1960s linoleic acid, and vegetable margarines and cooking oils that contain it, have been shown time and again to increase the risk of many types of cancer, including skin cancers. Speak against current guidelines — and lose your job?Johnathan Rees, Professor of dermatology, University Department of Dermatology, Newcastle upon Tyne, appraises the current melanoma 'epidemic', saying: 'There is after all no robust empirical evidence to defend most health promotion in this area. It has been suggested that the antithesis of science is not art but politics; melanoma is perhaps an example of the two having become mistakenly intertwined.'[vi]
Professor Rees is lucky that he still has a job. Michael F. Holick, a professor at Boston University, was asked to resign in April 2004 from the university's Department of Dermatology because of his book, The UV Advantage, in which he describes the importance of sunlight in boosting vitamin D levels; and for simply advocating a few minutes of sunlight exposure per week. The Department chairman, Barbara Gilchrest, MD, told the Boston Globe that the book ?is an embarrassment for this institution and an embarrassment for him'.[vii] Gilchrest's disapproval of Holick stems from the fact that his statements, superficially at least, seem to be at odds with the medical profession's consensus on the damaging effects of sunlight. Dermatologists have been warning the public for years that sunlight is a cause of melanoma. Some of them, possibly frustrated at the failure of most of their treatments to reverse advanced melanoma, now regard sun exposure without sunblock as analogous to promiscuous sex without condoms. But ultraviolet sunlight (particularly UVB) has essential functions. And Boston is in the far north of the USA, where usable sunlight is scarce and vitamin D is hard to come by. References[i]. Fackelmann, Kathleen. Melanoma madness. The scientific flap over sunscreens and skin cancer. Science News June 6, 1998; 153 (23): 360. |
"NH&WL may be the best non-technical book on diet ever written"
Joel Kauffman, PhD, Professor Emeritus, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA |